The Mississippi River’s Old River Control Structure, a National Single Point of Failure? Given the recent events in Fukushima and our subsequent western cultural obsession with the radiological consequences, perhaps it’s appropriate to reflect on other non-nuclear vulnerabilities. As a case in point what about the Old River Control Structure erected by those busy chaps [...]
Archive for the ‘Climate risk’ Category
National Single Points of Failure
Posted in Climate risk, Systems of Systems, tagged fluvial pressure, glacial retreat, Mississippi river floods, National infrastructure, Old River Control Structure, single point of failure, US Army Corp. of Engineers on 28/08/2011 | Leave a Comment »
What the IPCC Got Wrong
Posted in Climate risk, Logic of Scientific Discovery, Uncertainty, tagged climate change uncertainty, climate risk, degree of acceptability, degree of corroboration, Popper, probability, uncertainty on 04/04/2010 | Leave a Comment »
The IPCC issued a set of lead author guidance notes on how to describe uncertainty prior to the fourth IPCC assessment. In it the IPCC laid out a methodology on how to deal with various classes of uncertainty. Unforunately the IPCC guidance also fell into a fatal trap.
Communicating Risk (Pt 3) – Memes and the Media
Posted in Climate risk, Communication, Heuristics & Biases, tagged anchoring heuristic, Climate sceptics, media, memes, risk communication on 15/12/2009 | Leave a Comment »
While Smith and Madden’s argument turns out to be the usual denialist slumgullion it does serve as a useful jump off point for a discussion of the role of the media in propagating such pernicious memes and more broadly in communicating risk.
Communicating Risk (Pt 2) – Fallacious Arguments
Posted in Climate risk, Communication, tagged arguments, climate change, Climate sceptics, errors of logic, errors of psychology, fallacious, Risk on 06/12/2009 | Leave a Comment »
In the first part of this post on Drew Warne Smith and James Madden’s article on climate change I dealt with the factual basis of their argument. In this second part I want to spend some time looking at the logical and psychological elements of their argument.
Communicating Risk – (Pt 1) Just the Facts
Posted in Climate risk, Communication, tagged climate risk, Climate sceptics, fallacious arguments, media and risk perception, sea level rise, uncertainty on 15/11/2009 | Leave a Comment »
According to Drew Warne Smith and James Madden writing in the Nov 7th edition of the Australian “The science is in on sea-level rise: 1.7 mm” . Thererefore, according to Smith and Madden we don’t need to worry because it’s a modest 1.7mm rise and a third less than the government’s predictions. The article by Smith and Madden provides an excellent example of how fallacious arguments can be used mis-inform the unwary and thereby shape the public perception of risk.
Climate Change and Uncertainty
Posted in Climate risk, Decision making, Uncertainty, tagged 4AR Report, climate change, epistemic, IPCC, Risk, uncertainty on 08/11/2009 | Leave a Comment »
If you read through the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports you’ll strike qualitative phrases such as’likely’ and ‘high confidence’ to describe uncertainty. But is there a credible basis for these terms?