Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Climate risk’ Category

The Mississippi River’s Old River Control Structure, a National Single Point of Failure? Given the recent events in Fukushima and our subsequent western cultural obsession with the radiological consequences, perhaps it’s appropriate to reflect on other non-nuclear vulnerabilities. As a case in point what about the Old River Control Structure erected by those busy chaps [...]

Read Full Post »

The IPCC issued a set of lead author guidance notes on how to describe uncertainty prior to the fourth IPCC assessment. In it the IPCC laid out a methodology on how to deal with various classes of uncertainty. Unforunately the IPCC guidance also fell into a fatal trap.

Read Full Post »

Way off topic for this blog but I watched the ABC’s 7:30 current affair report on thursday in which Kevin, our illustrious prime minister, was put on the spot about why he has publically supported Australia having a population of 35 million people. His response? Well basically his argument was “it’s bigger than both of us so jus lie back and enjoy it”.

Read Full Post »

While Smith and Madden’s argument turns out to be the usual denialist slumgullion it does serve as a useful jump off point for a discussion of the role of the media in propagating such pernicious memes and more broadly in communicating risk.

Read Full Post »

In the first part of this post on Drew Warne Smith and James Madden’s article on climate change I dealt with the factual basis of their argument. In this second part I want to spend some time looking at the logical and psychological elements of their argument.

Read Full Post »

According to Drew Warne Smith and James Madden writing in the Nov 7th edition of the Australian “The science is in on sea-level rise: 1.7 mm” . Thererefore, according to Smith and Madden we don’t need to worry because it’s a modest 1.7mm rise and a third less than the government’s predictions. The article by Smith and Madden provides an excellent example of how fallacious arguments can be used mis-inform the unwary and thereby shape the public perception of risk.

Read Full Post »

If you read through the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports you’ll strike qualitative phrases such as’likely’ and ‘high confidence’ to describe uncertainty. But is there a credible basis for these terms?

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 100 other followers